Question

Read the following passage carefully and answer the question that follows. The modern economy of attention operates on an asymmetry the user rarely perceives. Platforms are engineered by thousands of specialists whose sole metric is the duration of engagement, while the individual, armed only with intention, attempts to resist. It is not a fair contest, and calling it one obscures the design at work: variable rewards, infinite scroll, and social validation loops exploit cognitive vulnerabilities that evolved long before the smartphone. Critics of this arrangement are often dismissed as technophobes, yet their argument is not that technology is evil but that its incentives are misaligned - when revenue depends on time spent, every design choice bends toward capture. The proposed remedies range from the personal to the structural: digital minimalism, usage dashboards, and, more ambitiously, regulation that treats attention as a resource deserving protection. Whether such reforms materialise, one fact is already settled - the scarcity in this economy is not information but the human capacity to attend to it. What is the central argument of the passage?