Question
Option 2 : supportive, citing ecological and social benefits
Detailed Solution
सही उत्तर supportive, citing ecological and social benefits है।
prepsnap.in • Part -AQuestion:
Read the following passage and answer the question that follows. A growing movement among urban ecologists holds that cities need not be biological deserts. By rewilding vacant lots, daylighting buried streams and planting native corridors along railway embankments, planners can weave functioning ecosystems into the urban fabric. Critics dismiss such projects as cosmetic, arguing that a pocket park cannot substitute for wilderness. Yet evidence suggests otherwise: insect and bird diversity in well-designed green corridors can rival that of the surrounding countryside, and the cooling effect of mature canopy measurably reduces heat-related illness. The deeper argument is philosophical - that a city which makes room for non-human life cultivates residents who notice, and therefore defend, the natural world beyond its borders. The author's attitude towards urban rewilding is best described as:
Correct Answer: supportive, citing ecological and social benefits
The author rebuts the critics with evidence on biodiversity and cooling effects and adds a philosophical argument in favour of rewilding, showing a clearly supportive stance.